[arch-dev-public] Definition of non-free for repo-reorg

eliott eliott at cactuswax.net
Thu Jul 12 17:09:59 EDT 2007

> Sadly, there are people out there who really do think like this.  They're
> like RMS fan boys and will only install software that is GPL or BSD
> licensed.

Not sure why you seem to be speaking derogatorily about people who
have strong feelings about which software they choose to use.

> I think people are more afraid of pulling in non-free dependencies though.
> Some people are really anal that way.

Again. Why the derogatory edge?

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list