[arch-dev-public] Next Developer Meeting

[Aaron Griffin]

On 5/10/07, James <iphitus at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Jason Chu <jason at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:40:50PM +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> > > 2007/5/9, Jason Chu <jason at archlinux.org>:
> > > > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:49:30AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > > > > On 5/9/07, Alexander Baldeck <kth5 at archlinuxppc.org> wrote:
> > > > > > +1 from me for the voip chat
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any other solutions than teamspeak though?
> > > > >
> > > > > I know very little about the process, so I can't comment.  I do know
> > > > > that teamspeak it pretty good, but that's it. I'd love to use a more
> > > > > Open Source solution, but I've never looked into it.
> > > >
> > > > I'd love to use something that I can get working through my new cell phone
> > > > ;)  So far I pretty much have skype and gizmo (SIP) going well enough to
> > > > use.
> > > >
> > > > If everyone got a gizmo account (free, SIP compatible client) we could have
> > > > a conference call that way.  I don't know how well the bandwidth management
> > > > stuff works.
> > >
> > > There is also WengoPhone (openwengo.org)
> >
> > As long as it's SIP compatible, then I can use my gizmo account to connect
> > to any conference room anywhere.
> >
> > Jason
>
> There's also ekiga, previously known as gnomemeeting.
>
> I suggested teamspeak, because i've used it before, it's fairly low
> fuss, and works well on slower connections too.
>
> And to be honest, I didn't put much thought to those who have english
> as a second language. Most of your written english is as good as, if
> not better than some native speakers, so I presumed that it wouldnt be
> too much of a problem. I still think it's worth a shot, I think we
> ought to be able to understand each other well enough for the purpose
> of the meeting.

And if not we could do IRC at the same time for those who aren't
comfortable with it... just a thought