[arch-dev-public] bugtracker vs package cleanup

Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Sun May 13 06:21:27 EDT 2007

2007/5/13, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> On 5/12/07, eliott <eliott at cactuswax.net> wrote:
> > > "Dan McGee" <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've never liked AUR comments as a method of tracking bugs. Using a
> > > bug tracker seems like the right way to do things, and I don't think
> > > it would be too big of a problem to either refine the AUR project that
> > > already exists or start a new one.
> >
> > I agree with Dan.
> >
> > Further, I think that since it largely seems that the TUs have historically
> > been the pool from which several devs were brought in from, that it makes
> > sense to have those folks using many of the same tools. This has a dual
> > benefit of reducing the tools that are used (focusing), and getting potential
> > new devs more familiar with the existing tools (training).
> Another benefit is making the TUs seem less like "second class
> citizens" as someone else said.  TUs are critical to Arch in it's
> current state.

So, if noone complaints and everyone think that's a good idea - please
setup Flyspray for this. ;-)
There are few possibilities:
1) new project
2) new group in AUR project
3) new group in Arch Linux project

3rd seems more logical, IMHO.

Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list