[arch-dev-public] Package Cleanup: Part II

Jason Chu jason at archlinux.org
Fri May 18 16:56:13 EDT 2007


On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 02:38:22PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Jason Chu <jason at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:50:37PM +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> > > 2007/5/18, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> > > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Package_Cleanup
> > > >
> > > > So the initial burst made a smallish dent, but there's still a lot
> > > > more to do, which I'd like to get to this weekend.  If anyone want to
> > > > help out, that'd be great.  In addition, please voice your opinions
> > > > about a few things (I haven't heard a lot of developers talk about
> > > > this, so I've left it alone:
> > > >
> > > > * Move desktop related stuff to extra? (possibly keep only xorg in current?)
> > > Yes. (Not sure if xorg will belong to Core, so probably move xorg to extra too)
> > >
> > > > * Move wireless/network modules to current? (they're that important IMO)
> > > depends on Core decission (which was done on DevMeeting, but no
> > > pkglist agreed yet)
> > >
> > > > * Rename current to "core" ?
> > > YESSSS!!!
> > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Core_Packages
> >
> > So we've actually defined what core packages are?  I just want to make sure
> > so we don't start fighting over what goes in and what doesn't.
> 
> I haven't heard input.  I'm going to run with the "no news is good news" adage.

I wrote a question on the Core_Packages page that no one answered.  I think
some people think this is more of a nuclear power plant than a bikeshed.

Jason
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20070518/f5c3c2a9/attachment.pgp>


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list