[arch-dev-public] Fwd: [tur-users] flyspray category for supp./unsupp. community packages?

[Roman Kyrylych]

In case our flyspray admins don't read tur-users ML frequently.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com>
Date: 1 Лис 2007 20:25
Subject: Re: [tur-users] [arch-dev-public] flyspray category for
supp./unsupp. community packages?
To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <tur-users at archlinux.org>


2007/10/25, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com>:
> 2007/10/25, Thomas Bächler <thomas at archlinux.org>:
> > Roman Kyrylych schrieb:
> > > See http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-May/000718.html
> > > Could we setup Flyspray so all community packages will reside in
> > > "Packages: Community" category?
> > > My concern is privilege separation between different categories of the
> > > same project.
> >
> > What about creating a separate project? ArchLinux and Community are in a
> > sense separate projects, so we could simply add a new one (with a good
> > name, we already have an AUR project).
> >
> > As long as we can move bugs between projects (can we?), this shouldn't
> > be a problem. It may confuse users though.
> >
>
> Yes, the only problem with separate project is user confusion.
> We are receiving ~10 reports per week in wrong project now, because
> Flyspray remembers active project in a cookie.
>
> But it seems that we cannot do any privilege separation in one
> project, so separate project appears to be the only good variant.
>
> Could our Flyspray admins give me the "Project Manager" status on
> Community packages?

ping

There are already 2 bugreports in "Community Packages" project (one of
which should be assigned to me) but I cannot do anything with them.
Just give me the Project Manager status and then I'll setup everything else.

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)