[arch-dev-public] sudo in base-devel group?

Jason Chu jason at archlinux.org
Mon Nov 5 09:56:31 EST 2007


On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 01:16:13AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On 11/4/07, Jason Chu <jason at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 05:55:07PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
> > > On Nov 4, 2007 5:20 PM, Jason Chu <jason at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > > > If I use the mkarchroot and makechrootpkg scripts to build packages, I need
> > > > to have sudo installed.  Using the current mkarchroot options I have to
> > > > specify "base base-devel sudo".  I just need to know if we're planning on
> > > > putting sudo into base-devel or if I should update the mkarchroot and
> > > > makechrootpkg scripts to reflect this.
> > >
> > > I put it into base/support, just like ssh and other tools that aren't
> > > "essential" but also aren't development tools. So no, I think its
> > > going to stay right there.
> >
> > Should we create a base-support group so that mkarchroot can create a
> > chroot with 'mkarchroot chroot base base-devel base-support'?
> 
> How's that any different though? Seems like you're actually going to
> get MORE than you need (ssh and the like).
> 
> I know it's not pretty, but I couldn't figure out a better way to
> handle sudo. And I don't want to restructure the repos strictly for
> the sake of one tool

It was just a suggestion.  It was the best I could come up with that didn't
involve installing sudo explicitly.

Jason
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20071105/47221d5e/attachment.pgp>


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list