[arch-dev-public] Kernel - vanilla vs patched?

[Tobias Powalowski]

> > The particular feature request is usable and works, i tested it here and
> > if you don't give a damn about acpi-cpufreq(which is not autoloaded at
> > all) you are not affected at all. If this patch existed 1.5 years ago i
> > wouldn't have needed to change the dip switches of my mainboard to
> > undervolt.
>
> I use acpi-cpufreq. And I have a very strong opinion about it, as I
> don't want it to be broken in _any_ way (I depend on it very much).
 then you are the perfect person to report issues if there will be any (which 
i hardly doubt).
You didn't even tell us if the -7 kernel works on your system.
It adds sysfs functionalty if you don't change something on it nothing 
happens.


-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20071111/15e9635c/attachment.pgp>