[arch-dev-public] Package removal update
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Tue Nov 27 11:35:12 EST 2007
On Nov 27, 2007 7:33 AM, Paul Mattal <paul at mattal.com> wrote:
> Why is xfsdump (to dump xfs) in core but dump (for ext2/3) in
Because no one brought this point up earlier 8)
> It seems we should support dump for filesystems we support. I'll
> take dump into core if desired. Or we could move xfsdump and dump
> both into extra.
I agree we should stay consistent, but how important are these apps? I
know I've never used or heard of anyone using them. I'd guess they're
recovery type tools, but we have a lot of those in extra already.
Would anyone have a problem with both of them being in extra?
More information about the arch-dev-public