[arch-dev-public] New ISO release thread, please all read!

Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 05:26:30 EDT 2007


2007/10/7, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> On 10/6/07, eliott <eliott at cactuswax.net> wrote:
> > On 10/5/07, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2007 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > > > On 10/5/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I suggest this:
> > > > > 1) move all *-ftp.iso's to archive/
> > > > > 2) move all *-base.iso's to archive/ too, except the last ISO with
> > > > > previous kernel version.
> > > >
> > > > This sounds like a plan, but it's going to bork our rsyncing hard.
> > > >
> > > > Eliott, Dale, Jan - do you guys have any sort of plan of attack here?
> > > > What would be the best way to do this that wouldn't force everything
> > > > to rsync like 5gigs all at once?
> > > >
> > > Hi
> > > I moved in the ISOs to 2007.08/ directory and remove the 2007.10 directory
> > > just a suggestion would it make sense to move the archive isos to a dir which
> > > is not rsynced and then add them slowly again to archive/ directory?
> > > just an idea
> >
> > 1) I have no idea what you just said tobias.
> > 2) Is Aaron's question now a moot point since you just said you moved
> > isos or something? Or were you talking about moving them but didn't do
> > it yet?
> > 3) pants
>
> Yeah ok. The ISO releases are floating around but we need to get rid
> of the OLD isos... it seems like moving them to some archive/ dir
> would be ideal, but that's a few gigs worth of rsyncing from each
> server - we are looking for an intelligent way to do this.
> Ideas?
>

Do all mirrors sync the archive directory?
Recently I checked all our mirrors and AFAIR there was no archive/ on
(most of) them.

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list