[arch-dev-public] License updates (was: rebuilding the whole core repo)

Jason Chu jason at archlinux.org
Mon Oct 22 13:41:03 EDT 2007

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:41:55AM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Jason Chu <jason at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > > Looking at it this way, caps seems stupid for licenses unless it is
> > > intended to be that way (e.g. GPL, BSD).
> >
> > I do like the licenses being all caps.  That's how I think of licenses.
> >
> > Either way, how would you case apache to make it more proper?  Apache?
> I would say that it shouldn't matter. We should do case insensitive
> matching here. I mean, really, do we want Apache, APAche, and aPACHe
> to mean different licenses? I doubt it.

Ok, that's fair enough.  I'll change the namcap license rule to be

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20071022/eb4927a3/attachment.pgp>

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list