[arch-dev-public] status of csup

Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 05:26:57 EDT 2007


2007/10/23, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> On 10/23/07, Paul Mattal <paul at mattal.com> wrote:
> > Dan McGee wrote:
> > > On 10/23/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Right now sudo is in Extra.
> > >> I request to move it to Core/base-devel because it is needed by
> > >> makepkg to be used by user (which is the right way).
> > >
> > > Seems reasonable to me, +1 as long as it doesn't pull in other deps
> > > and has maintainer(s).
> >
> > I will continue to maintain sudo in whatever location y'all deem
> > fit. At the moment, it sounds like [core] but maybe not base-devel.
> >
> > It only depends on pam and glibc.
>
> I vote it moves to core. Whether in base or base-devel is not a huge
> deal to me, though it fits better in base.
>

Hm, csup is like another candidate for base-devel - required by abs.
abs can also work with cvsup but we're going to dump it anyway because
it's non-portable.
It's only 49,6K, dependencies are gcc, zlib and openssl (all in Core).
gcc dependency should be changed to gcc-libs, of course.
What do you think?

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list