[arch-dev-public] flyspray category for supp./unsupp. community packages?
paul at mattal.com
Wed Oct 24 17:06:39 EDT 2007
Andreas Radke wrote:
> You all know we don't have a special category for community packages in
> our bug tracker. But why? I haven't seen any request for it until now.
> So far we point every request where to file bugs for community packages
> to the AUR comment fields. I see no good reason why we do that. We
> should have a dedicated bug tracking system with RSS feeds and
> maintainer assignment also for the community packages. Then everybody
> reading the feeds could help out fixing them. I expect a good
> improvement of the packaging quality.
> I don't know if it would be useful to also have it for the unsupported
> AUR packages. Maybe we should just start only with the supported
> community packages.
> What do TUs and other Devs think about it? And Roman?
+1. I agree we should just do this for [community] packages at least
More information about the arch-dev-public