[arch-dev-public] Repository cleanup [current] and [base] --> [core] , this weekend!
roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 07:58:14 EDT 2007
2007/9/13, Travis Willard <travis at archlinux.org>:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:14:46 +0300
> "Roman Kyrylych" <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2007/9/13, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de>:
> > > Am Mittwoch 12 September 2007 schrieb Jason Chu:
> > > > I'm still worried about the three different versions of the packages. Can
> > > > someone give me some numbers about untagged changes or differences between
> > > > arch64 and arch32?
> > > >
> > > > Jason
> > >
> > > http://archlinux.org/~andyrtr/pkg_diff.html
> > > i would say the red ones could be troublemakers
> > > the rest should be fine
> > There should be some untagged packages with done bugfixes in them.
> > In any case we shouldn't lose those untagged changes, as it will be a
> > PITA to find and fix them later again.
> > Doesn't CVS has some possibility to move untagged changes?
> If one of the packages we're moving has untagged changes, then why don't we use this move to tag the newest version, build, and upload it? Problem solved?
Yes. We just need to indentify all those packages, bump their pkgrel and upload.
> Is anything we're moving in TESTING currently? 'Cause there's another tag we have to deal with.
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
More information about the arch-dev-public