[arch-dev-public] 'base' and 'base-devel' group

Travis Willard travis at archlinux.org
Mon Sep 17 08:11:53 EDT 2007


On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:00:00 -0500
"Dan McGee" <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 9/17/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2007/9/17, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com>:
> > > On 9/17/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 2007/9/17, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de>:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > > i think i forgot to add csup to core/devel it is needed for
> > > > > abs or am i wrong here?
> > > >
> > > > You are correct.
> > >
> > > This seems like a good candidate for devel/, since you don't
> > > really need it to run a system...
> > >
> >
> > fakeroot too ;-)
> > it's not a dependency of pacman and for makepkg to be useful you'll
> > need base-devel anyway.
> 
> That kind of defeats the purpose of a split then, doesn't it. I
> understand your point, but it doesn't justify it not living in devel/.
> fakeroot should probably go there as well.
> 

Uh, isn't that what Roman just said?  csup seems a good candidate for
devel/, and fakeroot too?

--
Travis




More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list