[arch-dev-public] Additional Package ISOs

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 23:22:54 EDT 2007

On 9/27/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de> wrote:
> > Am Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:33:09 -0500
> > schrieb "Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Opinions, what do you guys think? I haven't really heard much comment
> > > on this topic so far.
> >
> > -1 from me
> >
> > Whoever will maintain such a script it will be very hard to satisfy all
> > license issue.
> > I prefer to solve the license issue first. Either let's move license
> > critical packages into a certain non-free repo or mark them in their
> > pkgbuild with some kind of a tag. I'd like to have the non-free repo
> > solution.
> I'm so confused here! The _script_ should not care at ALL about
> license issues, that is why the script will take a package list! It is
> up to the person generating the ISO or package bundle to ensure they
> are in compliance with any license issues, not the script.

Yeah Dan got what I was intending.

What I mean is a script that just uses a file that lists packages to
build us a nice big fat ISO. I really doubt it'd be much more than a
pacman --root=foo/, repo-add, and mkisofs.

This way, through human interaction, we can specifically manage any
and all license issues.

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list