[arch-dev-public] CVS links in AUR?
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Sat Apr 26 14:52:27 EDT 2008
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked
> > > in or anything else like that?
> > Why do you still have uncommitted changes in CVS when we initially
> > began this move something like 4 or 5 weeks ago. Please commit them if
> > they are important - if they are not important enough to commit after
> > 5 weeks, I automatically assume they are insignificant.
> Well when i redid the udev stuff ages ago, I had to let it langish
> because people told me to. And since CVS can't do offline diffs, I
> don't even know if I have changes in places. I'm sorry my workflow
> isn't quite like yours and that I sometimes like to view history
> through command line tools.
> I haven't had the chance to do a full checkout and pull the attached
> patch over and apply it to SVN, but maybe I'll get a chance sometime.
> > And yes, I'm pretty sure you're the only one still using CVS. Travis
> > and I spent about an hour (most of it was Travis though) making CVS
> > workable just for you, when you were one of the more vocal people for
> > moving away from CVS. Please stop using it so we can stop wasting time
> > fixing it when it breaks for you.
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > > Issues right now:
> > > 1) There is no public SVN checkout method yet
> > I sent you a personal email about getting rid of the autowifi svn repo
> > so we could repurpose the public svn stuff. Until you give me the
> > go-ahead on that, this can't happen.
> > > 2) The description should reflect that we use SVN and that community uses
> > > CVS (should mention where one can checkout community)
> > Which description? In the wiki?
> The link from the front page: http://archlinux.org/cvs/
> I'm normally a fan of progress and change, but I have to disagree with
> your tone in this email and how you've managed to move all wrongs to
> Thomas and I. Makes my work feel wanted around here.
Sorry if it came off that way. It wasn't intended like that. I apologize.
More information about the arch-dev-public