[arch-dev-public] Possible signoff addendum

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Sun Aug 31 01:12:22 EDT 2008

One of the things I was thinking about, because sometimes signoffs can

Should we have a time-based limit?

That is, if a package has been in testing for X days, with no
complaints, but no signoffs, yet, can we consider it fully functional,
assuming the packager is comfortable with that.

I'd like opinions on this. I'm trying to solve the issue of the big
ol' backlog of pending-signoff packages.


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list