[arch-dev-public] [signoff] bison 2.4-1
Eric Bélanger
belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA
Tue Dec 16 01:42:09 EST 2008
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Andreas Radke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:47:56 -0500 (EST)
>>>>> schrieb Eric Bélanger <belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bison 2.4-1 is in testing for both arches. Please signoff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes: minor upstream update, Added info file support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>
>>>>> please first make sure it doesn't cause this compile issue:
>>>>> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=58782
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have this build issue as well. I'll need to fix that before pushing
>>>> bison to core. I did tried to build bmpx that has bison as makedepends
>>>> before adding it to testing. It looks like it didn't triggered this
>>>> problem. I'll guess I'll use gcc for future tests.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's already a known issue upstream:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-bison@gnu.org/msg01218.html
>>>
>>> There are plans to release a 2.4.1 soon to fix this problem. I'll probably
>>> just wait for 2.4.1 then.
>>>
>>
>> Update: In case you haven't noticed, the gcc in testing has been patched to
>> build with bison 2.4. I've also fix libwebkit in svn to build with bison
>> 2.4. Let me know if other packages fail to build with bison 2.4 as patching
>> them is rather easy.
>>
>
> I've just updated the bison in testing to 2.4.1. It's a minor upstream
> update. The most important change is that the trailing semicolon problem that
> was causing build issues is now fixed. The patches that were added for gcc
> and libwebkit are no longer necessary but there's no hurry in removing them
> as the packages will still build with bison 2.4.1. Please signoff so we can
> finally move this to core.
>
>
Anyone?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list