[arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2008.02-1

[Jeff Mickey]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
>  This is a little off.
>  a) netcfg isn't required, so it'd be an optdepend. Still, an install
>  message would be a good idea for this.

Considering the utility used to be included in initscripts, a lot of
people wont know they need to install it to keep the menu.  I'd say
yea, an install message would be useful as a minimum.

>  b) udev 118 doesn't depend on initscripts. It's the other way around.
>  Sure adding that dep would have fixed your issue, but it's still not
>  the right way to fix this... the real fix is to re-release a udev
>  package that still contains start_udev.

Right right, now I get it.  Initscripts all ready has the udev>=118
dep..  Adding back the start_udev will work for now.  I just think
that this kind of thing will happen to a lot of users when combined
with netcfg being taken out of the initscripts into it's own package.

Go team.

    //  jeff
-- 
. : [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] : .