[arch-dev-public] FHS manpages (was: [signoff] iptables 1.4.0-1)
Dan McGee
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 16:04:37 EST 2008
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Dan McGee schrieb:
>
>
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Eric Belanger
> > <belanger at astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >>
> >> > Roman Kyrylych schrieb:
> >> >> 2008/2/26, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com>:
> >> >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Bächler <thomas at archlinux.org> wrote:
> >> >>> > In addition to a version bump, I changed the simple_firewall.rules file
> >> >>> > to a more generic and correct configuration.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Please sign off.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Seems to be OK here. Signoff i686.
> >> >>
> >> >> same here.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > anyone for x86_64?
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Man pages are not FSH compliant. No signoff from me.
> >
> > Do we have a namcap check for this yet? If not, the 'usr/man' part
> > could be removed from directoryname.py and at least that check would
> > then point out files in non-standard dirs.
> >
> > -Dan
>
> In the past we had makepkg move all manpages to /usr/man (for whatever
> reason). Why don't we move them all to the FHS path now?
Because it was a hack in makepkg to move them. Regardless of where
they end up, it is a hack to move things and I'd rather keep these
hacks to a minimum.
http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=9addd88a7d12c8c8445ec226e2837afe01e660b7
-Dan
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list