[arch-dev-public] dependency rebuilds

Travis Willard travis at archlinux.org
Fri Jan 4 14:40:54 EST 2008


On Jan 4, 2008 2:36 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 4, 2008 9:18 AM, Paul Mattal <paul at mattal.com> wrote:
> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > > On Dec 30, 2007 11:37 PM, Paul Mattal <paul at mattal.com> wrote:
> > >> 1) the package y maintainer(s) notices package x in testing and
> rebuilds
> > >> package y
> > >>
> > >> 2) the package x maintainer(s) is responsible to find all packages y
> and
> > >> rebuilds all such packages y against the new package x
> > >
> > > There's a middle-ground here which I like, myself.
> > > 1.5)  the package x maintainer(s) is responsible to find all packages
> > > y and posts a todo list on the dashboard
> > >
> > > I like this method, but at the same time, it requires one to
> > > constantly scan the todo lists to see if a package of yours is there.
> >
> > A slight variation on this is to the todo list + what Damir did..
> > post to a todo list and *also* put a post on the arch-dev-public
> > list. This way people get push notification, and also a place to
> > track what they've done and what they haven't.
>
> I like this one.
>
> So ok, let me propose this:
> With rebuilds, it's the library maintainer's job to find all dep packages.
> There are then two choices:
>   * build everything yourself, if you feel like it (yay!)
>   * make a todolist and post on the arch-dev-public ML so we know
> that there is a new rebuild todolist.
>
> Sound like a good process?


+1 from me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20080104/5e70a802/attachment.htm>


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list