[arch-dev-public] colour Kernel framebuffer logo
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 18:21:17 EST 2008
On Jan 25, 2008 4:49 PM, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa at solnet.ch> wrote:
> Friday 25 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote:
> | On Jan 25, 2008 12:53 AM PST, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de>
> | > Hi
> | > I am fine with any logo, please just provide me 3 files as i
> | > need them. thanks
> | > greetings
> | > tpowa
> | All three versions of the kernel logo are available here:
> | http://dev.archlinux.org/~thayer/art/kernel/archer-80x80-white/
> | I am not able to test the vga16 or monochrome versions, but it
> | looks to me like we're not even building the kernel with support
> | for these formats. For example, the kernel config in abs says:
> | # CONFIG_FB_VGA16 is not set
> | CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
> | The CONFIG_FBCON_MFB flag (for monochrome support) appears to be
> | missing entirely.
> | Anyway, the new logos are 80x80, adhering to the default tux
> | dimensions.
> | Let me know if you guys have any questions or requests.
> | Cheers
> hi Thayer,
> hi Tobias,
> hi all,
> i've made the 224 and 16 colour logo file for the kernel26 in colour
> (yours is white, i would say that if we have colours and the logo is
> in colour, we should use them - you agree?) and have tested both.
> they work, Tobias, you can find them here for replacement of the old
> logo in kernel26:
> with the mono logo i have serious trouble: i cannot make the new logo
> look nice in 1-bit space, it has edges and slopes that are hard to
> show nicely in 120 x 120 px without aesthetic errors. but as the
> monochrome framebuffer is anyway not built, i would not see this as
> something urgent.
> @Tobias: feel free to replace the old logo by the new one
Uh, hold the phone here. I thought we explicitly brought Thayer on as
our resident graphics guy.
More information about the arch-dev-public