[arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.033-2 and filesystem 2007.11-6

[Roman Kyrylych]

2008/1/30, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com>:
> On Jan 30, 2008 3:59 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2008/1/30, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > These two have been bumped because apparently some people still had
> > > problems due to an edge case with the generation of pacnew files  I
> > > bumped both the package and the md5sum on profile in order to get
> > > around edge cases with no pacnew files
> > >
> > > bash was a version bump too mainly to move the man pages
> > >
> > > filesystem changes:
> > >    Setup for FHS compliant man pages - FS#8839
> > >    Claim ownership of /etc/profile from bash - FS#4766
> > >    Remove LESSCHARSET env var from /etc/profile - FS#8877
> > >
> > > bash changes:
> > >    Update patch level to 033
> > >    Remove /etc/profile from package. Move bashisms to
> > > /etc/profile.bash - FS#4766
> > >
> > > /etc/profile was also largely revamped. Please comment on the changes
> > > there if you'd like.
> > >
> > > I'd like to get these into core as soon as possible
> > >
> > >
> >
> > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2008-January/016696.html
> > Should we consider /etc/issue not being in backup array as a bug?
> > Or this file should be added to NoUpgrade by user?
>
> I see no reason why this should be backed up. There is nothing there
> for the user to modify in a normal situation, and I guess 99% of users
> would want it overwritten. Seems like a good NoUpgrade candidate to
> me.
>

Sounds reasonable.
Bash works, profiles work, language settings are restored correctly
after reset&relogin (==profile.d works).
Signed off (i686).

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)