[arch-dev-public] Rebuilds against x264 needed

[Eric Belanger]

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Paul Mattal wrote:

> Eric Belanger wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Paul Mattal wrote:
>>>>>>>> The following rebuilds against x264 are needed for the soname bump 
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> new x264 snapshot in testing. I've already done mplayer and ffmpeg.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ./extra/avidemux (depends)
>>>>>>>> ./extra/vlc (depends)
>>>>>>>> ./extra/gstreamer0.10-bad-plugins (depends)
>>>>>>>> ./community/lib/libquicktime (depends)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://dev.archlinux.org/todo/1/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> mplayer and ffmpeg need x86_64 rebuilds also.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Greg
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll build the x86_64 packages tonight or tomorrow if no one else does 
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> mplayer and ffmpeg  have been rebuilt for x86_64.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And:
>>>>> ./extra/avidemux
>>>>> ./extra/vlc
>>>>> ./extra/gstreamer0.10-bad-plugins
>>>>> have been rebuilt for both arches.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Eric
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I ran lddd and more needed rebuilt for x264:
>>>> 
>>>> transcode
>>>> libavg
>>>> moc
>>>> swfdec-mozilla
>>>> swfdec
>>>> 
>>>> After a simple patch:
>>>> sed -i 's|ffmpeg/avformat.h|libavformat/avformat.h|' 
>>>> decoder_plugins/ffmpeg/ffmpeg.c || return 1
>>>> moc builds but the rebuilt moc gives a 'FATAL_ERROR: Layout1 is 
>>>> malformed' then quits.
>>>> 
>>>> I use swfdec and swfdec-mozilla so will definitely rebuild these if no 
>>>> one does. I'll do the rest if I have time.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Update: swfdec has been rebuilt for x86_64, swfdec-mozilla doesn't need to 
>>> be rebuilt.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> FYI, I've rebuit:
>> swfdec
>> moc
>> libavg
>> transcode
>> for both arches.
>> 
>
> Adding your items found with lddd to the todo list already in progress, and 
> putting motion back on the list (due to problems with the initial builds), I 
> think motion is now the only outstanding item for x264.
>
> Do you concur? If so, I'll hopefully sort that out over the weekend and we 
> can roll that whole gang out of testing.
>
> https://dev.archlinux.org/todo/1/
>
> - P

You should check the packages that (make)depends on ffmpeg to see if they 
need to be rebuilt. As ffmpeg depends on x264, they don't have a specific 
dependency on x264 but they get linked to x264.  The ones that I found 
with lddd fall in this category but I didn't had them all installed. One 
of us should install the remaining ones and run lddd.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.