[arch-dev-public] Pending initscripts issues

[Roman Kyrylych]

2008/3/10, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com>:
> 2008/3/10, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  > 2008/3/7, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > > I need to push out a 2008.03 initscripts package, and it will have
>  >  >  >  some fun changes from git and all, but I wanted to get a quick show of
>  >  >  >  hands for pending issues.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  I know there are some bugs I think I will close out tonight, and
>  >  >  >  others are more complicated.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  Here are bugs closed in git (some of these are old and fixed in 2008.02):
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8392 (??)
>  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9451
>  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4550
>  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1186
>  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9726
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  I also added my name to the copyright lines.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  Anything else?
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  For FS#1186 - see my last comment,
>  >  >
>  >  >  Some more reports:
>  >  >
>  >  >  * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5880#comment22912 - I think this
>  >  >  implementation is nice and KISS.
>  >  >
>  >  >  * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9239 - I've been working with bonding
>  >  >  configurations in past 3 days on my new job, so I'm now feeling pretty
>  >  >  confident in how things work, assigning it to myself, for the next
>  >  >  initscripts release.
>  >  >
>  >  >  * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9636 - I think this can be fixed
>  >  >  after the latest kernel goes to core by creating the needed nodes
>  >  >
>  >  >  * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9700 - a reminder added an install message
>  >
>  >
>  > OK, anything else? I think I am going to bump this tonight in
>  >  preparation for the new ISO.
>  >
>
>
> I won't be able to solve FS#9239 anytime sooner than the next night,
>  and it's not critical, so it could go to next version.
>  Could you compose some nice install message to get FS#9700 closed?
>

Forgot to say that I don't know/remember any blocker issues, so feel
free to bump initscripts toonight.

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)