[arch-dev-public] Pending initscripts issues

[Tobias Powalowski]

Am Montag, 10. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Roman Kyrylych
>
> <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2008/3/10, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com>:
> > > 2008/3/10, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> >  > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Roman Kyrylych 
<roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> >  >  >  > 2008/3/7, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> >  >  >  > > I need to push out a 2008.03 initscripts package, and it will
> >  >  >  > > have
> >  >  >  > >
> >  >  >  >  >  some fun changes from git and all, but I wanted to get a
> >  >  >  >  > quick show of hands for pending issues.
> >  >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  >  I know there are some bugs I think I will close out tonight,
> >  >  >  >  > and others are more complicated.
> >  >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  >  Here are bugs closed in git (some of these are old and fixed
> >  >  >  >  > in 2008.02):
> >  >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8392 (??)
> >  >  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9451
> >  >  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4550
> >  >  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1186
> >  >  >  >  >  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9726
> >  >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  >  I also added my name to the copyright lines.
> >  >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  >  Anything else?
> >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  For FS#1186 - see my last comment,
> >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  Some more reports:
> >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5880#comment22912 - I think
> >  >  >  > this implementation is nice and KISS.
> >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9239 - I've been working with
> >  >  >  > bonding configurations in past 3 days on my new job, so I'm now
> >  >  >  > feeling pretty confident in how things work, assigning it to
> >  >  >  > myself, for the next initscripts release.
> >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9636 - I think this can be
> >  >  >  > fixed after the latest kernel goes to core by creating the
> >  >  >  > needed nodes
> >  >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9700 - a reminder added an
> >  >  >  > install message
> >  >  >
> >  >  > OK, anything else? I think I am going to bump this tonight in
> >  >  >  preparation for the new ISO.
> >  >
> >  > I won't be able to solve FS#9239 anytime sooner than the next night,
> >  >  and it's not critical, so it could go to next version.
> >  >  Could you compose some nice install message to get FS#9700 closed?
> >
> >  Forgot to say that I don't know/remember any blocker issues, so feel
> >  free to bump initscripts toonight.
>
> Something came up. Won't be able to push this tonight unless someone
> else wants to (don't forget to the install message and git tags). We
> can always wait for 9239 anyway 8)

you don't need to hurry, we need also some other stuff,
if we get things done till wednesday or thursday im quite happy
greetings 
tpowa

-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20080310/ed7e22ba/attachment.pgp>