[arch-dev-public] ISO quality [was: kernel26 signoff]

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 17:38:40 EDT 2008


Splitting thread

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 24. März 2008 schrieb Simo Leone:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 07:28:13PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>  > > Users are happy with the new ISOs, just read the Forum thread about it.
>  >
>  > You know what. I don't care if the users are happy with the new ISOs.
>  > That's right, I finally said it.
>  > _I DON'T CARE_
>  >
>  > I don't care because _I_ am not happy with them. As someone who can see
>  > that from a technological standpoint, it's a marvel that they even work,
>  > that is, as a software developer, I'm ashamed to be associated with such
>  > a shoddy product.
>  >
>  > I've offered alternatives, hell I've spent a lot of time offering
>  > alternatives, built on more solid software enginerring principles
>  > than "Users are Happy", but no one around here, save Dan and Aaron, who
>  > just happen to be code contributors, seems to give a damn. What's up
>  > with that?
>
>  You never started to create ISOs nor you wanted to create them.
>  This topic here is about kernel26 signoff and i would be fine if people would
>  stay on topic.

Please see here back in October:
http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-October/002616.html


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list