[arch-dev-public] iso release? libtool signoffs

Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenmann at gmx.de
Wed Mar 26 16:20:17 EDT 2008

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:56:20 -0500
"Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de>
> wrote:
> >  Anyway, what about our iso release? tpowa didn't want to have
> > libtool moved before the release. Because I don't expect another
> > new ISO based on his work in the next days I want to push libtool
> > and related packages to core/extra. I know not all devs have
> > checked their packages for rebuilds or just not replied. All known
> > libtool issues have been fixed. I expect more from hidden depends
> > after a move to core but that wouldn't change if we keep libtool
> > longer in testing.
> >
> >  opinions? can i get signoffs for libtool 2.2-2?
> This sounds acceptable to me. If all the major libtool related issues
> have been run into, then I'm cool with it.
> I will give you a signoff tonight when I make sure I'm fully up to
> date and everything is running fine.
> Anyone else?

Signoff from me, see no problems on my programs here. Maybe we find
some more issues after the moving...but I think the most dependencies
are rebuilt.

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list