[arch-dev-public] [signoff] libtool 2.2.4-1

[Jan de Groot]

On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 23:03 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Wed, 14 May 2008 17:24:06 -0400 (EDT)
> schrieb Eric Belanger <belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA>:
> 
> > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de>
> > > wrote:
> > >> everybody on vacation? no signoffs?
> > >
> > > Probably. Signoff both arches from me.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > I was testing it by building libpng (which uses libtoolize) but the
> > build fails when using the libtool in testing. It seems to be
> > libtool-related. I don't know the cause yet.
> > 
> 
> hm. libpng 1.2.29 built fine here with libtool from testing. just remove
> all the libtool/autotools entries:
> 
> build() {
>   cd ${startdir}/src/${pkgname}-${pkgver}
> 
>   # Add animated PNG (apng) support
> #  patch -Np1 -i $startdir/src/${pkgname}-${pkgver}-apng.patch ||
> return 1
> 
> #  libtoolize --force --copy || return 1
> #  aclocal || return 1
> #  autoconf || return 1
> #  automake || return 1
> 
>   ./configure --prefix=/usr || return 1
>   make ECHO=echo || return 1
>   make ECHO=echo DESTDIR=${startdir}/pkg install || return 1
> 
> ...

libpng is no longer an issue, I fixed that one long time ago.

> 
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10173
> - this one may be a libtool related issue. but also our
> core pkg 2.2-2 would be affected and shouldn't hold back
> libtool 2.2.4-1.
> 
> so is there anything left holding us back?
> 

Don't think there's an issue that doesn't exist in 2.2-2 already.
Signoff for both architectures.