[arch-dev-public] request for dbus in core
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Sun Oct 12 14:00:45 EDT 2008
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jan de Groot <jan at jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 22:49 -0700, James Rayner wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Jan de Groot <jan at jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
>> > A while ago I got a request from Thomas to make a stripped down dbus
>> > package that does not depend on libx11 so he could use it for
>> > wpa_supplicant which is also in core.
>> > As more and more services start to interact with this dbus thing, I'd
>> > like to move the new dbus-core package into core. This pulls in one
>> > extra dependency from extra, which is expat at this moment.
>> > The new dbus package contains only the x11 parts of dbus and stays in
>> > extra.
>> my support for [core], as an upcoming netcfg version will take
>> advantage of the wpa_supplicant dbus interface.
>> Though, why did you split it rather than just using optdepends. Only
>> one very minor utility needed libx11 and you'd only be using it if you
>> had X installed.
> What's the policy on cross-repository dependencies these days? Is it
> normal to have core packages makedepending on packages from extra or
Hmmm maybe we can/should flesh that out. If it's a
makedepend/optdepend, I don't see a direct problem with it. It feels a
little funny, but other than that, I don't see anything technically
wrong with it.
Besides that, I'd support dbus in core. Split or not, it should be ok.
And expat in core seems slightly logical too
More information about the arch-dev-public