[arch-dev-public] Fixing licenses / sources
dibblethewrecker at gmail.com
Wed Apr 22 11:18:40 EDT 2009
2009/4/19 Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Phil Dillon-Thiselton
> <dibblethewrecker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/3/13 Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com>:
>>> I've made a list of packages with missing licenses. I still found the
>>> errors.txt too cluttered (list packages with non-(L)GPL license and
>>> for both arches) so I just used the abs tree on x86_64. Some
>>> i686-only packages might be missing but I'll add them later as there's
>>> plenty to do for now. The list :
>>> Just add your name beside the packages you plan to do. Better take a
>>> dozen or so at a time. Once they're done, remove them from the list.
>>> If they cause problems (soname bump, doesn't build/work, etc), skip
>>> them and replace your name with a note explaning the problem. You can
>>> try to find a patch or a fix but don't spend too much time on that.
>>> Better focus on the easy ones for now. We'll deal with the problematic
>>> ones later.
>> Can I just take t* for starters, please? That's about 13 pkgs and
>> seems as a good a set as any.
> Did you had time to fix these? Apart for some exceptions, only the
> t's and the v-z's are remaining.
Sorry, I have been completely unavailable due to an unplanned and
sudden loss of job situation! Obviously this couldn't have come at a
worse time as I was just settling back in!
Are all the t's still need to be done?
Epic fail on my part I know but I did manage to keep my job. So, not all bad!
More information about the arch-dev-public