[arch-dev-public] [signoff] inetutils-1.5-1

[Eric Bélanger]

On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:

>> telnet on i686 was fail for me. The escape sequence didn't seem to work at all.
> Sorry, I actually meant x86_64 here. This was the scene on i686:

I checked it and it's a regression from 1.5. I've notified the
upstream devs. I'll try to make a patch. I have no idea about the
symlinks.


>
> :: Retrieving packages from testing...
>  inetutils-1.6-1-i686     321.9K  212.4K/s 00:00:02 [---------------------] 100%
> checking package integrity...
> (1/1) checking for file conflicts                   [---------------------] 100%
> error: could not prepare transaction
> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
> inetutils: /usr/bin/ftp exists in filesystem
> inetutils: /usr/bin/rcp exists in filesystem
> inetutils: /usr/bin/rsh exists in filesystem
> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
>
> dmcgee at dublin ~
> $ pacman -Qo /usr/bin/ftp /usr/bin/rcp /usr/bin/rsh
> error: No package owns /usr/bin/ftp
> error: No package owns /usr/bin/rcp
> error: No package owns /usr/bin/rsh
>
> dmcgee at dublin ~
> $ ll /usr/bin/ftp
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2006-08-04 19:19 /usr/bin/ftp -> sftp
>
> dmcgee at dublin ~
> $ ll /usr/bin/rcp
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-06-12 23:22 /usr/bin/rcp -> scp
>
> dmcgee at dublin ~
> $ ll /usr/bin/rsh
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2006-06-12 23:23 /usr/bin/rsh -> ssh
>
>
> Anyone know where these symlinks came from? No package owns them, and
> they've obviously been around a while. They didn't exist on my newer
> x86_64 system.
>