[arch-dev-public] [signoff] inetutils-1.5-1

[Dale Blount]

On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 15:25 -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I checked it and it's a regression from 1.5. I've notified the
> >>> upstream devs. I'll try to make a patch. I have no idea about the
> >>> symlinks.
> >>
> >> Thanks for reporting it, you allow me to be slightly lazier! :)
> >
> > I already got an answer from the upstream dev along with a patch.
> > Please test inetutils-1.6-2.
> >
> >>
> >> I'm not too worried about the symlinks as they can clearly be blown
> >> away. But if all of us had them, it would at least be worth a news
> >> item.
> >>
> >> -Dan
> >>
> 
> Bump. Any signoffs?  Does anyone else got these file conflicts?
> 


I tested for the conflicts on two boxes, but nothing else.  So 1/3
signoff from me.

Dale