[arch-dev-public] LZMA - in or out? ([signoff] libarchive 2.6.0)
snowmaniscool at gmail.com
Mon Jan 12 20:42:21 EST 2009
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jan de Groot <jan at jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 15:15 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> Where did this go?
>> Do we have any additional opinions regarding LZMA? Personally, I think
>> LZMA is great, and the new licensing (LGPL?) opens a lot of doors.
>> Personally, I can't wait to see squashfs-lzma to pick up speed.
>> I agree with Dan though - libarchive isn't just a dep of pacman. We
>> also ship bsdtar, which I use quite often.
> I think having an LZMA-enabled version of libarchive/bsdtar would fix
> this bug also:
> At this moment, rpmextract can't extract RPM files that use LZMA
> To solve the above bug partially, I'm thinking about rewriting
> file-roller to use bsdtar for extracting compressed cpio files. Without
> LZMA support in bsdtar, this will still fail for SuSE's RPM files
These are all good reason for lzma support in libarchive. No
objections from me.
More information about the arch-dev-public