[arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.048-3, texinfo 4.13a-2, glibc 2.9-3

Allan McRae allan at archlinux.org
Thu Jan 29 02:03:31 EST 2009


Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>   
>> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Andreas Radke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Am Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:31:13 -0600
>>>>> schrieb Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Aaron Griffin
>>>>>> <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> These three packages contain fixes for our core dep-cycle that was
>>>>>>> discussed in another thread.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes:
>>>>>>> texinfo now scans *all* info files on install (not on upgrade)
>>>>>>> - this means that packages do not need direct deps, as it will pick
>>>>>>> up all info files when it's installed
>>>>>>> glibc and bash no longer require/depend on texinfo
>>>>>>> - existence of install-info is checked before running it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please signoff. The install ISOs need these packages to ensure
>>>>>>> installation happens cleanly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> $ pacSu --ignore openoffice-base
>>>>>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>>>>>> warning: openoffice-base: ignoring package upgrade (3.0.0-4 =>
>>>>>> 3.0.1-1) resolving dependencies...
>>>>>> warning: dependency cycle detected:
>>>>>> warning: glibc will be installed before its bash dependency
>>>>>> looking for inter-conflicts...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Something doesn't seem quite right here, I thought this resolved these
>>>>>> issues? Or did that only pertain to info?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> The update went smooth here with pacman from current.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything's working here (x86_64). If the dep cycle is solved we will
>>>>> see when we start testing the new ISOs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> There still appears to be some issues:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> sudo mkarchroot /home/tmp/root base
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> ...
>>>> Targets (102): kernel-headers-2.6.27.6-2  tzdata-2008i-1  glibc-2.9-3
>>>>       ncurses-5.7-2  texinfo-4.13a-2  readline-5.2.013-1
>>>>  bash-3.2.048-3  dash-0.5.5.1-1  attr-2.4.41-1  acl-2.2.47-1 ...
>>>> warning: dependency cycle detected:
>>>> warning: glibc will be installed before its bash dependency
>>>> ...
>>>> (  1/102) installing kernel-headers
>>>> [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>> (  2/102) installing tzdata
>>>> [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>> (  3/102) installing glibc
>>>>  [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>> (  4/102) installing ncurses
>>>>  [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>> (  5/102) installing texinfo
>>>>  [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>> error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
>>>> (  6/102) installing readline
>>>> [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>> (  7/102) installing bash
>>>> [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>> (  8/102) installing dash
>>>> [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>> (  9/102) installing attr
>>>> [#####################]
>>>> 100%
>>>>
>>>> Note that a "pacman -Rd texinfo" followed by "pacman -S --asdep texinfo"
>>>> give no errors so it is an install order issue.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Oh... the change in the scriptlet added a findutils dep. Totally
>>> missed that. Could someone verify that adding that dep fixes that for
>>> good?
>>>
>>>       
>> Building texinfo with findutils as a dep I get:
>>
>>     
>>> sudo mkarchroot /home/tmp/root base
>>>       
>> warning: dependency cycle detected:
>> warning: bash will be installed before its glibc dependency
>> warning: dependency cycle detected:
>> warning: readline will be installed before its texinfo dependency
>> warning: dependency cycle detected:
>> warning: readline will be installed before its glibc dependency
>> warning: dependency cycle detected:
>> warning: ncurses will be installed before its glibc dependency
>>
>>
>> (  1/102) installing ncurses                        [#####################]
>> 100%
>> (  2/102) installing readline                       [#####################]
>> 100%
>> (  3/102) installing bash                           [#####################]
>> 100%
>> error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
>> (  4/102) installing kernel-headers                 [#####################]
>> 100%
>> (  5/102) installing tzdata                         [#####################]
>> 100%
>> (  6/102) installing glibc                          [#####################]
>> 100%
>> (  7/102) installing findutils                      [#####################]
>> 100%
>> (  8/102) installing texinfo                        [#####################]
>> 100%
>>
>> So I am thinking the bash/glibc cycle actually needs fixed to get things
>> working.  I will build glibc without bash as a dep now and see if that
>> helps.
>>     
>
> Actually, I'm confused as to why the bash scriptlet would fail at
> all... it only runs install-info and only if it is present. Sure you
> used the latest version?
>   

Definite:
  bash-3.2.048-3 
  glibc-2.9-3 
  texinfo-4.13a-3 (my rebuild with findutils as a dep)

I don't understand this either...   Rebuilding glibc without "sh" in the 
dep list gives:

 > sudo mkarchroot /home/tmp/root base
...
(  1/102) installing kernel-headers                 
[#####################] 100%
(  2/102) installing tzdata                         
[#####################] 100%
(  3/102) installing glibc                          
[#####################] 100%
(  4/102) installing findutils                      
[#####################] 100%
(  5/102) installing ncurses                        
[#####################] 100%
(  6/102) installing texinfo                        
[#####################] 100%
error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly
(  7/102) installing readline                       
[#####################] 100%
(  8/102) installing bash                           
[#####################] 100%






More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list