[arch-dev-public] faad2/ffmpeg/x264 update/rebuild

Allan McRae allan at archlinux.org
Sun Mar 1 17:54:34 EST 2009


Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There will be an upcoming update to faad2, ffmpeg and x264. Both faad2
>>> and x264 will have an soname bump so a rebuild will be neccessary.
>>> I'll do the rebuilds.  I'll also check for updates and trivial bug
>>> reports to do at the same time..
>>>
>>> The packages that will be rebuilt are:
>>> ==faad2 rebuild
>>>
>>> avidemux
>>> cmus
>>> faad2
>>> ffmpeg
>>> gstreamer0.10-bad-plugins
>>> mpd
>>> muine
>>> mythmusic
>>> streamripper
>>> vlc
>>> xine-lib
>>>
>>> ==x264 rebuild
>>>
>>> avidemux
>>> ffmpeg
>>> gstreamer0.10-bad-plugins
>>> motion
>>> mplayer
>>> opal
>>> transcode
>>> vlc
>>> x264
>>>
>>>       
>> The rebuilds are in testing now. They are:
>>
>> avidemux
>> cmus
>> faad2                    - Upstream update, Updated LICENSE file,
>> Compiled with -fPIC option (needed for muine)
>> ffmpeg                  - Upstream update, Added qt-faststart utility
>> (close FS#13298)
>> gstreamer0.10-bad-plugins
>> mpd                       - Upstream update, Added glib2 and curl
>> depends, Added mod support, cleaned up .install file (close FS#12282)
>> mplayer                  - Enabled lirc support (close FS#12989),
>> Added XvMC support (close FS#13265), Added FM radio support (close
>> FS#11480)
>> muine                     - Added gnome-icon-theme makedepends
>> mythmusic
>> opal
>> pal
>> streamripper          -  Upstream update
>> vlc
>> x264                       - Upstream update
>> xine-lib
>>
>> Motion and transcode didn't need to be rebuilt. They just needed a
>> rebuilt ffmpeg.  Please test and report any problems or missed
>> rebuilds.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>     
>
> No problems has been reported so far. I'll push these to extra
> tomorrow night unless something come up.
>   

There seems to be one...  http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13621







More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list