[arch-dev-public] our FAT support and Microsoft
t.powa at gmx.de
Sun May 3 05:25:33 EDT 2009
Am Sonntag 03 Mai 2009 schrieb Andreas Radke:
> Am Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:59:37 +0200 (CEST)
> schrieb Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de>:
> > http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom-
> > I haven't done further investigations but it seems we should take care
> > about keep supporting the FAT file system.
> > How is the state with NTFS? Is the license situation there more safe?
> > Opinions?
> > -Andy
> Kernel developers are working on it:
> We might think to use this option in our next kernel packages.
really, why to restrict vfat that way?
Think of usbsticks with fat format, thats horrible imho.
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the arch-dev-public