[arch-dev-public] putting "beta" software in [testing]
RedShift
redshift at pandora.be
Wed Oct 7 17:54:41 EDT 2009
Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> coreutils-8.0 has been released but flagged beta because of some fairly
> large changes in rm which now uses gnulib's hierarchy traversal (=
> faster) and many changes to gnulib in the area of filesystem
> primitives. I found the snapshot before this fully usable, and will do
> a "make check/test" to ensure everything is working as it should.
>
> I would like to put it in [testing] _without_ the option of it every
> moving to [core]. I know we do this for some software, but never
> anything so "core" to the system that I know of.
> So... can I use [testing] for testing in this case?
>
> Allan
>
>
Since the general consensus is that "testing" is proving ground for packages intended to be moved to core/extra, I don't think putting beta software there is a good idea. Maybe we can create a new repository, called "staging", that replaces the current "testing" repository and use the "testing" repository for really experimental stuff like beta software.
Glenn
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list