[arch-dev-public] [PATCH 0/7] Namcap performance improvements

[Aaron Griffin]

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Dan McGee <dan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> In the spirit of Eli making a bunch of patches for the AUR, I finally decided
>> to sit down tonight and figure out why the heck namcap was sucking it up, and
>> did a little code cleanup along the way. namcap.py is now a bit cleaner and
>> separated into functions, and the real treat is namcap is a hell of a lot
>> faster now that I found the bottleneck, which was the depends hook. The first 6
>> patches in this series lead up to the 7th, which is where the speed increase is
>> found.
>>
>> Let me know what you see, otherwise it would be cool to get this in and a new
>> namcap release made, as it has rather dramatic effects with regards to speed.
>>
>> If you don't like patches, you can get all this from my git tree as well:
>> http://code.toofishes.net/cgit/dan/namcap.git/log/?h=working
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> Dan McGee (7):
>>  Rename 'tags' to 'namcap-tags'
>>  Only process tags if necessary
>>  Move extracted variable to the correct scope
>>  Only do active_modules check once
>>  Move PKGBUILD processing to a function
>>  Move real package processing to a function
>>  Make the depends module not suck
>>
>>  Namcap/depends.py |  104 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>  README            |   10 ++--
>>  namcap-tags       |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  namcap.py         |  173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>  setup.py          |    2 +-
>>  tags              |   65 --------------------
>>  tests/tags-check  |    4 +-
>>  7 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 namcap-tags
>>  delete mode 100644 tags
>
> Pinging the namcap maintainer?

It's listed as Jason, who's account was removed in the last run of deletions.

Anyone interested in maintaining namcap? I thought Hugo showed some
interest here.