[arch-dev-public] Moving to pkg.tar.xz officially?
dale at archlinux.org
Tue Mar 9 15:23:15 CET 2010
> >> We might also want to write a little announcement to inform users about this
> >> change. While most of them wont be affected, some would have to adjust their
> >> custom scripts. And for those who use netinstall on a 2009.02 or older iso
> >> would have to run pacman -Syu once to get a version of libarchive which is
> >> able to deal with xz.
> > If we do this, we should leave pacman and libarchive in a historic
> > format for quite a while (or forever). Those packages are already small
> > enough it doesn't really matter.
> I was going to respond to this thread and say we should keep a small
> subset of packages in tar.gz format for things like this. Most of them
> happen to be mine, but:
> * pacman
> * libarchive
> * libfetch
> * zlib ?
> * glibc ?
> * bash ?
+1. At some point pacman is going to need a glibc update to work and
not being able to install glibc because it's a xz is an issue. We
should probably add a versioned glibc to pacman's depends so someone
doesn't end up upgrading pacman and not being able to run it because
glibc didn't get updated as well.
More information about the arch-dev-public