[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

Tom Gundersen teg at jklm.no
Mon Dec 5 15:07:37 EST 2011


On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Tom Gundersen <teg at jklm.no> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2011, at 10:07, Arch Website Notification <nobody at archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> === Signoff report for [testing] ===
>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
>>
>> There are currently:
>> * 8 new packages in last 24 hours
>> * 0 known bad packages
>> * 0 packages not accepting signoffs
>> * 8 fully signed off packages
>> * 36 packages missing signoffs
>> * 3 packages older than 14 days
>>
>> (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
>> pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
>> package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
>>
>>
>> == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) ==
>>
>> * binutils-2.22-1 (i686)
>> * gcc-4.6.2-2 (i686)
>> * glibc-2.14.1-2 (i686)
>> * linux-api-headers-3.1.4-1 (i686)
>> * binutils-2.22-1 (x86_64)
>> * gcc-4.6.2-2 (x86_64)
>> * glibc-2.14.1-2 (x86_64)
>> * linux-api-headers-3.1.4-1 (x86_64
>
> One of these packages seem to have broken my network. I'll downgrade one-by-one tonight to figure out which one, and create a more sensible bug report.

I'm back home now, and unable to reproduce with my own wireless
network. I guess this can be ignored then...

-t


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list