[arch-dev-public] Vi package
bisson at archlinux.org
Thu Feb 10 02:51:26 EST 2011
[2011-02-09 11:23:53 -0500] Stéphane Gaudreault:
> 4) A compact version of vim
Since it is both maintained upstream and featureful, it seems like the
most reasonable choice to me. And I personally think that the few
additional 100KB compared to other vi's is worth it.
> * May need a duplicate PKGBUILD as vim is in [extra] while vi is in [core]
Would you still name that package "vi" and prevent it from conflicting
with the vim of [extra]? Or something like "vim-tiny" that would
conflict and provide vim?
More information about the arch-dev-public