[arch-dev-public] [signoff] licenses 2.7-1
snowmaniscool at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 17:43:11 EDT 2011
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> Added Perl Artistic 2.0 (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21167),
> dropped RALINK as it isn't in use anymore.
Is there any reason why the Perl Artistic 2.0 license is installed in
a Artistic2.0 directory? Wouldn't it be more logical to have it in a
PerlArtistic2.0 directory as we already have a PerlArtistic directory
containing version 1 of the license?
In case this is just nit picking, then consider this my signoff (on x86_64).
More information about the arch-dev-public