[arch-dev-public] [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0.6-2
thomas at archlinux.org
Sun Oct 9 03:47:49 EDT 2011
Am 09.10.2011 06:22, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> Could you point me to some more info about this (I couldn't find any
> bug reports)?
If I remember right, if you load p4-clockmod and try to set ondemand as
governor, cpufreq will refuse the to change the governor. On i686, linux
even refuses to build the performance governor as a module, even if it
is not the default.
> I'm interested in following up on it so we can one day
> move to ondemand by default.
There is absolutely no reason for that.
> For what it's worth, fedora and opensuse
> have been using ondemand for some time. Is it known why we are seeing
> problems and they are not?
I'm not sure if we would actually see any problems, it just seemed like
a bad idea to me.
> My understanding was that ondemand is recommended by upstream
> (http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/power/good_practices.html), and that
> it should automatically fall back to performance if the HW latencies
> are too high. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I would hope so - but at least on x86_64, the performance governor might
be unavailable, so there is nothing to fall back to.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the arch-dev-public