[arch-dev-public] Migration to systemd

Dan McGee dpmcgee at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 13:09:33 EDT 2012


On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Dave Reisner <d at falconindy.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:39:34PM +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>> On Tuesday 14 August 2012 18:34:13 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> > There are still a lot of unit files missing; we should create a todo
>> > list. It would also be helpful to write down a simple wiki page with
>> > some guidelines here.
>>
>> Did I miss something or did you miss the Jan's todo list[1]?
>>
>> > E.g. I am not sure if we should read those
>> > /etc/conf.d/$damon files from the unit files as well or drop these as
>> > the user should override unit files in /etc.
>>
>> Indeed, I was wondering if we should adapt our packages to the layout used by
>> the upstream systemd services files. E.g. the upstream proftpd service sources
>> /etc/system/proftpd, but our packages installs /etc/conf.d/proftpd.
>
> So there is no standard for this, and the general recommendation is that
> if you disagree with the default command line args the service in /lib
> provides, you should simply override the service in /etc. If anything,
> I'd vote that /etc/conf.d (or whatever other name you give it) should
> slowly shrink/disappear over time.

What does the non-standard think about distro-provided updates to the
units? Seems like with overriding the whole thing rather than small
pieces in a separate config file, it isn't obvious to the user when
they need to merge updates to the unit files.

-Dan


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list