[arch-dev-public] iproute2 to base
Gaetan Bisson
bisson at archlinux.org
Mon Oct 15 21:29:52 EDT 2012
[2012-10-16 10:50:30 +1100] Gaetan Bisson:
> [2012-10-15 20:48:46 +0200] Thomas Bächler:
> > Am 15.10.2012 20:12, schrieb Daniel Wallace:
> > >>> Makes sense. I'll add it to the 'base' group.
> > >>
> > >> Not needed as netcfg already depends on it.
> > >>
> > > netcfg isn't in base either
> > >
> >
> > As I pointed out recently, it should be.
>
> Possibly, but regardless of what we end up doing with netcfg,
> iproute2 should be in base in its own right.
I just saw you removed wpa_supplicant from the base group too...
So if I understand your position correctly you are against individual
network connectivity tools being in base, but CLI/GUI using them are
fine?!? I mean, why not, but I thought base was supposed to be minimal.
--
Gaetan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20121016/71045337/attachment-0001.asc>
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list