[arch-dev-public] mesa packaging, libGL handling

Andreas Radke andyrtr at archlinux.org
Sun Feb 17 14:03:57 EST 2013


Am Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:17:03 +0100
schrieb Laurent Carlier <lordheavym at gmail.com>:

> Le vendredi 15 février 2013 20:02:28 Tom Gundersen a écrit :
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Jan Steffens
> > <jan.steffens at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Laurent Carlier
> > > <lordheavym at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> > >> Perhaps we could merge:
> > >> - mesa, khrplatform-devel
> > >> - libglapi, libgl, libgles
> > >> - libgbm, libegl
> > > 
> > > Also, the pipe drivers from libgbm should be sorted into the *-dri
> > > packages.
> > Out of curiosity, what would be the benefit of keeping it split up
> > rather than just merging (almost) everything?
> > 
> > -t
> 
> Just asked on irc, libegl can only work with mesa, not with
> nvidia/ati blobs. So a merge between libglapi, libgl, libgles, libgbm
> and libegl make sense.
> 
> 
> 

My current plan: merge libglapi mesa osmesa libgbm libgles libegl
khrplatform-devel and a separate libgl with libGL.so and libglx.so
conflicting with nvidia-utils. Not sure if we can do this without
symlinks.

I'd like to keep separate *-dri driver packages. Nobody needs drivers
for other hardware.

-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20130217/b4c9a79d/attachment.asc>


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list