[arch-dev-public] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]
rodseth at gmail.com
Sun Jan 20 18:05:32 EST 2013
Didn't think of that, here's the current list:
I also checked that none of these packages are makedepends of any of
the [community] packages.
> Please send such messages to arch-dev-public in the future: adopting
> packages are dev's and TU's decision, and not all read arch-general.
I also think non-devs and non-TUs may have valuable insights for why
for instance a package should be considered to be too important to not
be moved to unsupported. The ibus and lxdm packages were considered to
be too important to move to unsupported during the last cleanup.
Perhaps someone (the upstream developers?) may have a reason or
opinion for why one of the listed packages should not be moved. The
decision would still be in the hands of devs and TUs, but there could
still be potentially useful information coming from "the outside".
> 45.8 degrees beg to differ.
Point taken, and suggestions for a better name are welcome. How about
"New Year Cleanup"?
xyproto / TU
More information about the arch-dev-public