[arch-dev-public] libaacs - suitable for [community]?

[Rashif Ray Rahman]

On 7 January 2014 23:53, Martin Wimpress <martin+arch at flexion.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the packages I'd like to move from the AUR to [community] is
> `libaacs` [1]. I think is suitable because I see that `libdvdcss` is in
> [extra].
>
> But after a chat in #archlinux-tu I was suggested that I should check
> here first.
>
> Thoughts?

Looks fine to me. They explicitly state that the stuff is fully legal,
no grey area. But it's good that you brought it up. When unsure,
always get more opinions.


--
GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1