[arch-dev-public] dosfstools to base group?

[Jonathan Steel]

On Wed 18 Jun 2014 at 10:35, keenerd wrote:
> On 6/18/14, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > On 17/06/14 23:49, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38076
> >> looking at this old request, any objection to add this to base group?
> >>
> >
> > I don't think this needs to be in base, but should be on the install
> > iso.  There is also a bug report somewhere asking for xfsutils and
> > jfsutils etc to be removed from base.
> >
> > Allan
> 
> Since Alarm was mentioned previously, they feel it is relevant to
> mention that dosfstools in base does not really matter to their
> project.  Like Allan said, it can be added to the installer regardless
> of groups.
> 
> -Kyle
> http://kmkeen.com

I recently found dosfstools was a dep of clonezilla (one of its scripts
calls it), so that will pull it in to the iso next time, unless you want to
specifically include it.

-- 
Jonathan Steel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20140618/16214485/attachment.asc>